4g61t.org

Specializing in the 3g CSM
It is currently Mon Nov 03, 2025 12:46 pm

All times are UTC-05:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:35 am 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFFudEJnjk

!!!


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:27 am 
Offline
CSM Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:44 am
Posts: 474
Location: AMITYVILLE, NY
that shit is sick, really nice setup. i think thats the most hp ive heard coming out of a s2000.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:29 am 
Offline
CSM Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 10:59 pm
Posts: 654
Location: AB Canada
Has to be the most. But I doubt its stock internals, maybe stock with thicker head gasket maybe but not on stock compression.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:56 am 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:40 pm
Posts: 1033
Location: Lyndhurst,VA
question is how longs the rear gonna hold? i've seen stock units take a dump at the track with just drag radials.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:39 am 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
Quote:
Has to be the most. But I doubt its stock internals, maybe stock with thicker head gasket maybe but not on stock compression.
He claims a 100% stock bottom-end.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:27 am 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 4:08 am
Posts: 1263
Location: Hayward, CA
thats one sick s2k! wonder how it compares to the swapped 2jz s2000's?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:07 pm 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
Quote:
thats one sick s2k! wonder how it compares to the swapped 2jz s2000's?
The 2jz is always gonna make more torque, but it will make the car heavier.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:12 pm 
Offline
Restricted Newbie

Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:33 am
Posts: 13
Location: Exton, PA
I am usually not a fan of Honda's, but this thing is pretty sick.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:19 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god

Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 1650
Location: North Idaho, USA
It's so hard to impress Tony. That's the impressive reality! :P

Very hard to imagine the drivetrain is that strong....but I wouldn't know for sure. That car is wicked!


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
1595 cc's of fury

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 3:15 pm
Posts: 1616
Location: Rastle Cock, CO
Its either not stock, or won't run for long. The s2k's are impressive but severly lack strength. One hard launch with that kind of power will break the either the rear end, axles, drive shaft, trans...or a combination. I've watched several stock ones break rear end's and axles at the track with DR's and traction.

Also the power band isn't very impressive, it takes way to long (even at higher boost) to get to 150 mph. He barely beat the 600 and the 1000 was gone. That just seems slow, even if he was only at 600 whp, the Widow vs a modded R6 and 636 wasn't even a competition (probably 6-8 car lengths from 60 - 140) and it makes much less whp and is at a similar weight now.

Still, I've always wondered why there arn't more bad ass S2K's on the streets...


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:56 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:32 pm
Posts: 1470
Location: Castle cock, CO
This is how you take out a liter bike....http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Outl ... 184260.htm A local 2g....


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:43 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:08 pm
Posts: 1025
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Im not impressed, I built all motor Hondas that can woop an R6 more than that. Probably more like a 400whp S2K.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:45 pm 
Offline
CSM Junkie

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 483
Location: washington
the only thing saving that motor is the turbo not being in its peak effiency because a s372 at 8 psi or even 18psi isnt shit for that turbo


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:02 pm 
Offline
CSM Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 10:59 pm
Posts: 654
Location: AB Canada
Quote:
the only thing saving that motor is the turbo not being in its peak effiency because a s372 at 8 psi or even 18psi isnt shit for that turbo

So its the classic strap on a big ass turbo without doing the research to mate the engine with the best turbo for flow/efficiency....


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:02 pm 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
Quote:
Im not impressed, I built all motor Hondas that can woop an R6 more than that. Probably more like a 400whp S2K.
Well they say in the description that it wasn't making 701whp when they filmed it, so at 18psi it's very possible that he was only in the 400whp range.
Quote:
Its either not stock, or won't run for long. The s2k's are impressive but severly lack strength. One hard launch with that kind of power will break the either the rear end, axles, drive shaft, trans...or a combination. I've watched several stock ones break rear end's and axles at the track with DR's and traction.

Also the power band isn't very impressive, it takes way to long (even at higher boost) to get to 150 mph. He barely beat the 600 and the 1000 was gone. That just seems slow, even if he was only at 600 whp, the Widow vs a modded R6 and 636 wasn't even a competition (probably 6-8 car lengths from 60 - 140) and it makes much less whp and is at a similar weight now.

Still, I've always wondered why there arn't more bad ass S2K's on the streets...
According to lots of my Honda buddies, there are many cases of guys running 600+whp on stock internals, but the fact that he's doing it on stock drivetrain is sort of unbelievable. As far as weight, S2K's are up around 2,800lbs from the factory IIRC.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next

All times are UTC-05:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited