4g61t.org

Specializing in the 3g CSM
It is currently Wed Oct 29, 2025 3:05 pm

» »

All times are UTC-05:00



Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 6 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
bfrontin
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:53 am 
Offline
CSM Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 6:47 pm
Posts: 735
Location: Trinidad, Caribbean
1. http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=237982

2. http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=105573

so guys...which one seems more correct?

there seems to be a conflicting school of thought!

ive got the in-car MBC and im wondering as well, if running these vacuum lines into the cabin will cause boost spikes etc? what about the setup would prevent this.

turbonetics in-cabin MBC.

thanks

_________________
96 Lancer Stationwagon - 4G61T swap (rebuilt) (4g67 head, 4g63 intake mani), 390cc's, ported exhaust mani/with 2.5" custom d/pipe, TD04-13g (ported), Greddy Emanage (Gold Edition), VR4 18x12x3 IC with custom piping/hose, SR-20 (Silvia) Recirc BOV, Walbro 255lph pump, custom 2.25" press bent de-cat exhaust, ACT 2100 (4g67 g/box), front EVO II brake/booster upgrade
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Halon
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:08 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:12 am
Posts: 30
Location: Twin Cities, MN
I prefer the method in your first link. I've tried both ways on my car, and using the ones right off the compressor housing just gives me a much more solid number. I'd get a small spike when I ran it off the BOV line. Either will work, but I always hook it up to the comp housing. P

lus I don't like to use Tee's where I don't need to, and the install usually looks cleaner, and less vacuum line strung through the engine bay.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
colt200
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:35 am 
Offline
Some call me a god

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 8:01 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Sask. Canada
I use the first one myself too. Worked good for me, never had a problem related to where i got the source from.

_________________
- Works in da bush
Top
   
Reply with quote  
SpinMasta11
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:34 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 9:36 pm
Posts: 1031
Location: Fburg, VA
My pressure source is off the manifold because the gate will stay closed longer between shifts which keeps you in boost just a touch longer. I tee the BOV into that line also.

_________________
1989 Dodge Colt Turbo w/ 4g63t swap
1999 Ford Contour SVT
Top
   
Reply with quote  
aaronsbig16g
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:37 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 2:20 am
Posts: 1154
Location: Anderson, IN
I have always used the second and had no problems. I can not even use the first one on my colt because I dont have the nipple on the elbow since I made my intercooler pipes.

_________________
92 Colt GL 4g63t + AWD swap
00 Mirage LS
Top
   
Reply with quote  
89coltgt
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:47 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 2347
Location: Missouri
Either one will work Brian. You may as well utilize the nipple on the compressor outlet :wink: You can run the mbc under hood as well, just keep it away from alot of heat.

_________________
John
89 Colt GT(2)
88 d50 4g63t, crower 272's, dsmlink
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 6 posts ] 

» »

All times are UTC-05:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited