4g61t.org

Specializing in the 3g CSM
It is currently Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:02 pm

All times are UTC-05:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:12 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:08 pm
Posts: 1025
Location: Las Vegas, NV
I know you guys are always looking for 90 Eproms, but is it a big deal to use the 92 ECU in the 89 Mirage? Besided the two wires you have to switch is it only the issue with the Tach signal?? Its been so long since Ive have to deal with this I cant remember.

I have my DSM link in my 91 Galant VR4 right now but Im going to swap it back to my Mirage. I dont have the tach filter any more because Im using the tach signal from the DIS-2 so I think I wont need to worry about that. Car has spark, just dont know if the tach is going to work.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:19 pm 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
It's the same as putting a 91+ ECU in a '90 DSM, you have to swap pins 6 and 14, and the tach won't work, but the car will run fine.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:25 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:08 pm
Posts: 1025
Location: Las Vegas, NV
I know on a 91-99 you can cut the white wire on the transistor and feed it with the tach output from the DIS-2 so you dont need the tach adapter, should that work with a 89-90 car also? Only difference would be Im using the 4th Yellow wire from the Coil pack Harness??


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:48 pm 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
Quote:
I know on a 91-99 you can cut the white wire on the transistor and feed it with the tach output from the DIS-2 so you dont need the tach adapter, should that work with a 89-90 car also? Only difference would be Im using the 4th Yellow wire from the Coil pack Harness??
I don't know to be honest. There is something physically different about the '90 ECU's that changes the way the tach works, it nothing to do with any of the ignition components.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:19 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:20 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Mansfield, PA
The 90 ECU's are different because they require a noise filter. I'm sure it could be rewired like they are in DSM's. I believe its only 2 wires that you have to change around.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:14 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:03 pm
Posts: 1134
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
If all your worried about is the tach, why dont you try a tach from a 91-92 CSM. Its a theory but I think that the 91-92 12 valve 1.5l cars did didn't need the filtered signal.


Last edited by j2dapo on Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:02 pm 
Offline
Restricted Newbie

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:23 am
Posts: 12
http://www.dsmchips.com/1990ecu.html

keydivers site has alot of info. it may help you


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:17 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:08 pm
Posts: 1025
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Well I talked with that Keydriver guy and pretty much what he told me was 89-90 cars Tach and ECU use a Positive pulse to run the dash tach and the ECU. The Tach interface coverts that signal to a positive pulse. I need to leave the tacho interface in place so my tach will read correctly and then use the DIS2's negative pulse output and feed it to pin 109 for a tach signal to the ECU. Sounds like it will work I guess.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC-05:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited