4g61t.org
http://www.4g61t.org/forum/

9.6@149
http://www.4g61t.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=39078		 Page 3 of 4
Author:  boostfreak [ Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
Quote:
did you guys un plug the waste gate on those runs :) love the videos
No we have a little steam left-not much though-maybe 3-4 mph with NASA boost and better Gas (this was on old Cam2)
Author:  CaptainTonus [ Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
Why not run E85?
Author:  Shawn J [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
That car is badass for sure! Congrats :supz:

What front bumper cover is on this car? It looks like the 90-91 Plymouth Laser style. Also, what is that extra lip at the bottom of the bumper cover? This is basically the exact look I want for my car.
Author:  cheaptalon [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
It is an Eclipse (same as laser) front bumper cover with the option lip that came on 90-only turbo models.
Author:  CaptainTonus [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
Quote:
It is an Eclipse (same as laser) front bumper cover with the option lip that came on 90-only turbo models.
That lip came on non-turbo '90 Eclipse GS's as well.
Author:  boostfreak [ Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
Quote:
Why not run E85?

Would need more pump/injector and to be safe different lines and filters. More parts=more $$$!! This at the end of the day is a VERY nice budget build- but still on a budget. I know Matt wants to take this set up as far as possible. He has a sweet old school 3567r (35r turbine with a T-67 compressor) in a t3/.82 that would max out the fuel system in its current form. That would be the next step since the current 35r has a .63 turbine and IMO would not be worth the cost to go e85 with.
Author:  cloead [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 6:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
Quote:
Quote:
Why not run E85?

Would need more pump/injector and to be safe different lines and filters. More parts=more $$$!! This at the end of the day is a VERY nice budget build- but still on a budget. I know Matt wants to take this set up as far as possible. He has a sweet old school 3567r (35r turbine with a T-67 compressor) in a t3/.82 that would max out the fuel system in its current form. That would be the next step since the current 35r has a .63 turbine and IMO would not be worth the cost to go e85 with.

he better not going any faster until i get my car going
Author:  panda colt [ Fri Nov 21, 2014 2:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
If this is the fastest awd hatch what is the fastest FWD hatch pass. Just wondering.
Author:  Flying Eagle [ Fri Nov 21, 2014 8:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
Colorado's Black Widow was running fast but may have been surpassed.

Too many fast cars get posted now. Love it, don't get me wrong, just cant put them all to memory. :)
Author:  biglady112 [ Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
There is a guy out of new York running 9.9-10.0 fwd. We are looking to better the black widow's time next year. This year was more about the 1/2 mile event. Next year will be as well and if we can a mile event. Our drag testing yielded broken parts the first time and a rain out the next time. In the end we are trying to get the car to a 210-220mph run in the mile and we will not make it our major focus to beat the black widow. So it may stand for a while.
Author:  panda colt [ Sat Nov 22, 2014 2:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
I think I might have answered my own question. I just watched a video of a front wheel colt that went 10.00 @ 149. Correct me if I'm wrong but that's the quickest one I could find.
Author:  panda colt [ Sat Nov 22, 2014 2:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
I posted before I checked for a reply my bad but that sounds like the car I saw is it white?
Author:  biglady112 [ Sat Nov 22, 2014 6:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
It is the white one.
Author:  panda colt [ Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
Ok must be the same one. Car definitely fly's
Author:  dr2.0 [ Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 9.6@149
that is sick
Page 3 of 4 All times are UTC-05:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/