4g61t.org

There's alot of them running around cleveland. The newer r/t's have a t56 trans available, near 400 hp and sitting about 3800 lbs. Does a 16g fwd colt stand a chance?

them being heavy as fruit and banana, might give you the edge with your 1 tire fire.

_________________
4g61t.org
4g61t.com

The power to weight ratios are favorable for a csm with 300 hp and 2500 lbs. But obviously torque and traction go to the tcs equipped v8. My race of choice would be a 60 roll but even then it seems close.

Also, i dunno what kind of power those 5.7s gain from typical mods.

Motor Trend:
2010 SRT8 Challenger, 0-60 4.8 sec, 13.3 sec @ 106.1 mph
2008 Challenger R/T, 0-60 5.1 sec, 13.6 sec @104 mph
Hope this helps!

_________________
4g61t.org
4g61t.com

point taken sir.

Looks like the Challengers don't stand a chance.

I thought the Challengers were up around 4,200lbs. full weight. They're pigs. A CSM with half as much power would be able to take it on the freeway easily.

_________________
91 GSX - 511fwhp and 352 lb/ft 25psi 110 octane, 7.68 @ 95.9mph 1/8th 21psi 91 octane, 11.93 @ 112.9mph, 117.7mph best trap speed, 20psi 91 octane
98 Volvo S70 T5 - DD

http://www.facebook.com/captaintonus

...and your standard run of the mill AWD CSM should be able to take one from a dig easily.

yea yea

Race-wise, colt any day. Style-wise, I'd take a challenger, one done up like an old trans-am racer would look badass.

_________________
Had a:
1991 Eagle Summit ES Hatchback - 4g15 12v 5spd
1991 Dodge Colt -4g15 12v 4spd
Have a:
1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass - 468BBO TH350
Round 3:
1990 Dodge Colt-4G63T 5spd

I'm with Mechacode, they got way more style. Plus, Vanishing Point!!

_________________
90 Eagle Summit 1.5 - Wrecked
92 Eagle Summit ES 1.6 DOHC n/a - Parts
92 Eagle Summit 1.5 - Sold
94 Talon TSi AWD Auto - Sold
90 Laser RS FWD 4G63T - Hit and totalled

Summer - 2000 Pontiac Fireturkey Trans Am LS1 A4
Winter - 2006 Honda CRV K24 5MT

The 2011 Mustang GT is by far the best of the retro muscle car fad in terms of performance. They're goddamn fast. The Challenger is very stylish for sure, but they just aren't a good enough performer for the amount of money.

_________________
91 GSX - 511fwhp and 352 lb/ft 25psi 110 octane, 7.68 @ 95.9mph 1/8th 21psi 91 octane, 11.93 @ 112.9mph, 117.7mph best trap speed, 20psi 91 octane
98 Volvo S70 T5 - DD

http://www.facebook.com/captaintonus

whats the mustang up to?! forgot they were updating the power plant with the sheet metal.

the great thing about the challenger to me is, the only people whom i see driving them are older guys reliving their youth, or arabic guys living their youth. basically neither group would think to suspect that my lil blue wagon is about to embarrass them on a Saturday night. if i were to smoke a challenger i'd know the driver is PISSED. im like a highway troll .

They're rated at like 414hp, but people are putting down like 390 with them, so they're way under-rated. It's a 5.0L motor now, and they trap like 112-113 in the 1/4 and get 26mpg on the highway. Pretty bad ass.

_________________
91 GSX - 511fwhp and 352 lb/ft 25psi 110 octane, 7.68 @ 95.9mph 1/8th 21psi 91 octane, 11.93 @ 112.9mph, 117.7mph best trap speed, 20psi 91 octane
98 Volvo S70 T5 - DD

http://www.facebook.com/captaintonus

I never liked Fords much, but that is nice. Still I wish Chrysler would bring back the General Lee. Yee Haw!