All 1993+ Colts/Summit/Mirages switched over to 4x100 bolt patterns for FWD, and those were the platform the EVO1-3 were built with, albeit AWD in the rear section of the car.
Every listing I found for EVO2 showed two bolt patterns, 4x114.3 and 5x114.3, so if the picture matches the goods, then you are good to roll from that side of things.
http://www.wheel-size.com/size/mitsubis ... evolution/
Quote:
A quick search and they all say the Lancer Evolution 1, 2, and 3 use 4x114.3 so I'm good there!
If the Evo2 used similar or identical geometry to the 1993+ Mirage/Colt in base 2WD trim, then you may have a winner for a complete front corner brake package.
Look up the orientation for brake line fitment for RWD models at PartSouq.com and confirm that the brake lines coming out of the master cylinder are in the same orientation as your factory setup and you may not have to bend much if anything to compensate. New lines are available as I found out for the C50 front brakes from the proportioning valve to the master cylinder.
The reason I ask you to compare the geometry of the front knuckles, is to confirm the fitment (top or bottom) of the outer tie rod, and furthermore the changes to your geometry as you steer down the road.
Evo knuckles may be identical to non-EVO knuckles and they may have used different control arms to allow for more positive caster (read more stability at high speed, possibly more steering input required from an energy value as you turn the front wheels at lower speeds, and better self centering).
If say the outer tie rod position now moves further out from the steering rack, then you end up with fewer threads on the inner tie rod to hold the outer tie rod. Maybe a change to new inners of a different length, maybe not. I will try and find the guy that was posting about using EVO brakes on the front and possibly rear of his C50-C60 Mirage. He was Australian if I remember correctly.