4g61t.org
http://www.4g61t.org/forum/

G-Tech results
http://www.4g61t.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=14255		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  nodents [ Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:23 pm ]
Post subject:  G-Tech results
Well, I don't know how accurate g-tech's are, but here are some #'s.
0-60: 5.92 sec's
1/4: 14.3 @ 101.9
This was with squealmaster 196/60-14 tires, one with 24 psi and the other with 35 :-? I don't know if it would have been better with my falken azensis 205/50-15.
Major items are, - '61t, evo 3 16g, 190 pump, 650 injectors, maft, smic,etc.
I didn't run higher than 17 psi because a friend(?) put in only 91 octane.
Author:  Timmylikesboost [ Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Fast Car
Thats a pretty quick car, on a pretty cheap budget! Im looking to do a very similar setup on my 4g61t Mirage. Keep up the good work.
Author:  nodents [ Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
Track rained out again-3 times in a row-damn!

Anyway, set up the car with the falkens (azenis) and 94 octane with 20 psi. Went with the G-tech again and got this: 0-60.-5.28 , 1/4-13.95 at 101.7. Nice to see e.t.'s go down, but why isn't mph going up? Is the 2.5 pressbent exhaust choking it?
Author:  Mechacode [ Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:07 pm ]
Post subject: 
I'd say yea, you're flowing *alot* of air at 20psi, 3" mandrel at least.

G-tech is supposed to be fairly accurate if they're calibrated.

http://www.4g61t.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=104745
Author:  unior [ Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:49 pm ]
Post subject: 
see you guys call that quick - but i don't quite understand - i trapped 100 mph on an almost bone stock 3200 awd car ?

shouldn't that car trap way way way higher with those mods and 800 lbs less weight!?
Author:  Flying Eagle [ Fri Sep 16, 2005 5:54 pm ]
Post subject: 
All stock internals on nodents motor's end; stock cams, etc.
Wade pulled 202 hp on the Mustang Dyno the day I was there along with his DSM buddies. His power isn't up much from last year as he told me. The other big problem was that he just figured out that his catalytic is only 2" :o I'll have to let him confirm that though. When we had the car on the dyno - he did however have the catalytic disconnected which in turn accounted for the melted undercoating that got wicked and blown onto the dyno flooring! 8)
Author:  unior [ Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:12 pm ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
All stock internals on nodents motor's end; stock cams, etc.
Wade pulled 202 hp on the Mustang Dyno the day I was there along with his DSM buddies. His power isn't up much from last year as he told me. The other big problem was that he just figured out that his catalytic is only 2" :o I'll have to let him confirm that though. When we had the car on the dyno - he did however have the catalytic disconnected which in turn accounted for the melted undercoating that got wicked and blown onto the dyno flooring! 8)
well i ran open exhaust to trap 100mph - is this a 1.6 or 2.0?
Author:  Flying Eagle [ Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:52 am ]
Post subject: 
1.6 8)
Author:  lumpy [ Sun Jan 22, 2006 7:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
they arent accurate at all we have the new one and used it like 10 times it said we ran 10.90's evertime.......the car runs like low 12's if that
Author:  Mechacode [ Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
Stop starting it after the car is moving.
Author:  lumpy [ Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:35 pm ]
Post subject: 
if u are talking in reply to me the car was stopped from a dead launch :ANAL:
Author:  Sinisfun [ Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
I know this is an old thread but I'd like to throw in my $0.02 because I've had such good luck with my Gtech.

I've had two G-tech's, one of the early ones I used and I didn't really find it that accurate, but I think that was more me not setting it up properly. With the new Gtech Pro RR that I have it is very accurate, I've found +/- 0.02 seconds from the Gtech to the track, and that could be due to the differences in atmosphere between where I live and where the track is.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC-05:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/